Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] serial: fsl_lpuart: add DMA support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:34:49AM +0000, Yao Yuan wrote:
> Here I also have a confusion.
> IRQ is must. But DMA isn't very necessary.
> How to deal with if one board is need DMA but another is not need?
> You mean if DMA is be support once all of them must use dma as first?

That's the point.  Why whether using DMA or not is a board decision?
The DMA resource should be defined at SoC level from the beginning
just like IO and interrupt resource.  And using DMA or PIO should be a
decision made by device driver not device tree.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux