> > So, let's go back to your original worry, what are you concerned about? > > A device being removed while probe() is called? > > My concern is that we're turning something which should be simple into > something unnecessarily complex. By that, I mean something along the > lines of: Or in fact more complex in other cases because your remove may well be refcounted so the stuff may not be going away in the foo_remove() path. > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(foo_mutex); > static unsigned foo_devices; > > static int foo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > int ret; > > mutex_lock(&foo_mutex); > if (foo_devices++ == 0) > uart_register_driver(&driver); > > ret = foo_really_probe_device(pdev); We have atomic_inc_and_test and atomic_dec_and_test so it's fractionally less ugly. > in every single serial driver we have... Wouldn't it just be better to > fix the major/minor number problem rather than have to add all that code > repetitively to all those drivers? Quite. Although for some drivers I suspect what is actually missing when built in is module_init() { if (not_the_right_platform()) return -ENOGOOD; } Going dynamic is the right fix though. Changing how the driver registration work is a different (and quite independent) problem. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html