Hello Hector,
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:01:47PM +0200, Hector Palacios wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 02:22 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Hector Palacios wrote:
> >>The shutdown function was not waiting for the FIFO (which may be the
> >>real 16 byte FIFO or the DMA buffer, if DMA is enabled) to flush
> >>before disabling the AUART.
> >>This lead to many bytes not being transferred (specially at low
> >>baudrates), as they were still in the DMA buffer when the AUART was
> >>shutdown.
> >>This patch also adds the check for the BUSY flag before disabling
> >>the AUART.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@xxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >> drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> >>index 9f046177..589b595 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> >>@@ -757,9 +757,22 @@ static int mxs_auart_startup(struct uart_port *u)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >>+static unsigned int mxs_auart_tx_empty(struct uart_port *u);
> >>+
> >> static void mxs_auart_shutdown(struct uart_port *u)
> >> {
> >> struct mxs_auart_port *s = to_auart_port(u);
> >>+ unsigned int to;
> >>+
> >>+ /* Wait for the FIFO to flush */
> >>+ to = u->timeout;
> >>+ while (!mxs_auart_tx_empty(u) && to--)
> >>+ mdelay(1);
> >>+
> >>+ /* Wait for UART to become idle ... */
> >>+ to = u->timeout;
> >>+ while ((readl(u->membase + AUART_STAT) & AUART_STAT_BUSY) && to--)
> >>+ mdelay(1);
> >If the 2nd loop is needed the tx_empty callback is buggy. According to
> >Documentation/serial/driver tx_empty "tests whether the transmitter fifo
> >and shifter for the port [...] is empty". I guess it only tests for the
> >fifo part? Time for another fix ...
>
> Do you mean the tx_empty should check both for TX_FIFO and !BUSY, right?
> I did it so because I thought the BUSY was also set during rx, but
> it is really only used to signal tx operation.
>
> That would turn this patch into this:
>
> @@ -755,13 +755,21 @@ static int mxs_auart_startup(struct uart_port *u)
> writel(AUART_LINECTRL_FEN, u->membase + AUART_LINECTRL_SET);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int mxs_auart_tx_empty(struct uart_port *u);
There is no need for a forward declaration if you move the whole
function.
> +
> static void mxs_auart_shutdown(struct uart_port *u)
> {
> struct mxs_auart_port *s = to_auart_port(u);
> + unsigned int to;
> +
> + /* Wait for the FIFO to flush */
> + to = u->timeout;
> + while (!mxs_auart_tx_empty(u) && to--)
> + mdelay(1);
>
> if (auart_dma_enabled(s))
> mxs_auart_dma_exit(s);
>
> writel(AUART_CTRL2_UARTEN, u->membase + AUART_CTRL2_CLR);
> @@ -774,14 +782,15 @@ static void mxs_auart_shutdown(struct uart_port *u)
> clk_disable_unprepare(s->clk);
> }
>
> static unsigned int mxs_auart_tx_empty(struct uart_port *u)
> {
> - if (readl(u->membase + AUART_STAT) & AUART_STAT_TXFE)
> - return TIOCSER_TEMT;
> - else
> - return 0;
> + if (!((readl(u->membase + AUART_STAT) & AUART_STAT_BUSY)))
> + if (readl(u->membase + AUART_STAT) & AUART_STAT_TXFE)
> + return TIOCSER_TEMT;
if you do
stat = readl(u->membase + AUART_STAT);
if ((stat & (AUART_STAT_BUSY | AUART_STAT_TXFE)) == AUART_STAT_TXFE)
return TIOCSER_TEMT;
you save one register read and a small race condition.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
