On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:32:10PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 06/17/2013 04:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 09:14:12AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > >>Greg, > >> > >>As before, this patchset is dependent on the 'ldsem patchset'. > >>The reason is that this series abandons tty->receive_room as > >>a flow control mechanism (because that requires locking), > >>and the TIOCSETD ioctl _without ldsem_ uses tty->receive_room > >>to shutoff i/o. > >> > >>It is also dependent on 'n_tty fixes' which I recently resent > >>to you. > > > >Thanks for rebasing all of this, and resending it. It's late in the > >3.11 development cycle, so I'm going to wait unto 3.11-rc1 is out to > >queue it up for 3.12, to get it lots of testing in linux-next. > > Thanks Greg. I actually meant to suggest these be held until after > the merge window but I got distracted by the VT1 deallocation bug > report. Now applied, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
