On 25/06/13 11:58, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:57:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> >>> This seems fairly complete, but I cannot have such a basic dependency onto >>> the regmap tree this late in the merge window, i.e. I'm not ready to pull >>> all of regmap into the pinctrl tree. I'd consider this for merging >>> for the next kernel cycle so it's more orthogonal. >> >> I've got the patch on a topic branch in regmap to allow for this sort of >> stuff - I can readily provide a signed tag for you to get just that >> patch if that'd help? Alternatively I'm happy to carry the pinctrl >> patch in regmap? > > I'm OK that you carry this in the regmap tree. > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Linus W. > > The clock retime weirdness convinced me that this cannot really > use the generic pin config layout... > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > > _______________________________________________ > Kernel mailing list > Kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
