On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 06:34:40PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 06:04:57PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > My personal preference would be that you (Paul) merge this patch by yourself: > > > [PATCH v3 1/3] serial: sh-sci: Add OF support > > > > > > I believe we can deal with the SoC bits easily afterwards. Simon may > > > however prefer to deal with it differently. > > > > > > Simon, how do you prefer to handle merge of DT support for the SCIF driver? > > > > I am fairly ambivalent. > > > > If Paul could merge this patch upstream in the v3.9-rc1~rc3 time frame > > then I can queue up the SoC portions for v3.10. > > > > Or alternatively I can queue up all three patches for v3.10. > > Either way the outcome should be much the same. > > Waiting an entire kernel version to throw some arbitrary dts file updates > in seems a bit absurd, but I'll let you handle it however you like. I > haven't sent out my SH updates to Linus yet, but plan to do so by -rc2 > (there isn't really that much to begin with, most of it has gone through > other trees), so in light of this I will throw the sh-sci OF patch in to > my queue directly then. Thanks, much appreciated. I entirely agree that my tree has longer lead-times than are desirable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
