Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] serial: sh-sci: Add OF support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:11:34PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:03:26AM -0600, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> >> >> We add the capabilty to probe Renesas SCI devices using Device Tree setup.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Bastian Hecht <hechtb+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> v3:
> >> >> - add remaining register layouts to bindings
> >> >> - remove register set mapping sci_regtype_modes[]
> >> >> - adapt renesas,regtype probing
> >> >>
> >> >> - add enums SCBRR_ALGO_INVALID and SCBRR_NR_ALGOS
> >> >> - check renesas,scbrr-algo-id boundaries using new enums
> >> >>
> >> >>  .../bindings/tty/serial/renesas,sci-serial.txt     |   53 ++++++++
> >> >>  drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c                        |  126 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >> >>  include/linux/serial_sci.h                         |    4 +
> >> >>  3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/renesas,sci-serial.txt
> >> >>
> >> > Looks good to me.
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Thanks. Do you intend to merge this yourself at some point, or do you
> >> have some other preferred way to deal with this?
> >>
> > I can merge it if you like, but then obviously the ARM patches will have
> > to wait until that part is upstream. I assumed you would want them all
> > grouped together, at which point I don't mind if it goes through some
> > other tree.
> 
> [Added Simon as CC]
> 
> My personal preference would be that you (Paul) merge this patch by yourself:
> [PATCH v3 1/3] serial: sh-sci: Add OF support
> 
> I believe we can deal with the SoC bits easily afterwards. Simon may
> however prefer to deal with it differently.
> 
> Simon, how do you prefer to handle merge of DT support for the SCIF driver?

I am fairly ambivalent.

If Paul could merge this patch upstream in the v3.9-rc1~rc3 time frame
then I can queue up the SoC portions for v3.10.

Or alternatively I can queue up all three patches for v3.10.
Either way the outcome should be much the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux