Re: [PATCH -next] serial: xilinx_uartps: fix return value check in xuartps_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 05:12:43AM -0500, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In case of error, function of_clk_get() returns ERR_PTR()
> and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value
> check should be replaced with IS_ERR().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> index 2be22a2..1eb4657 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> @@ -948,9 +948,9 @@ static int xuartps_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  
>  	clk = of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> -	if (!clk) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no clock specified\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		return PTR_ERR(clk);
>  	}

This patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, what am I doing wrong?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux