Hi Jiri & Alan, 2013/1/2 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Looks good, but I would prefer the layer to provide us with >> wake_up_if_active... > > Seconded - this is a problem for the wake up logic in the RT tree. Why > would we ever do anything else ? I don't understand your responses: do you suggest to implement this "if active" behavior in: * A new wake_up function called wake_up_if_active() that is part of the waitqueue layer? * Implement this behavior in the existing wake_up() function as part of the RT patch? Regards, Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
