Thanks for the review. On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:33:44AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 10/31/2012 07:58 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > [...] > > +#define PERIPH_CLK_CTRL_SRC(x) (periph_clk_parent_map[((x)&3)>>4]) > > +#define PERIPH_CLK_CTRL_DIV(x) (((x)&0x3F00)>>8) > > A few more spaces wouldn't hurt ;) Okay, sure. > > [...] > > +static void __init zynq_periph_clk_setup(struct device_node *np) > > +{ > > + struct zynq_periph_clk *periph; > > + const char *parent_names[3]; > > + struct clk_init_data init; > > + struct clk *clk; > > + int err; > > + u32 reg; > > + int i; > > + > > + err = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", ®); > > + WARN_ON(err); > > Shouldn't the function abort if a error happens somewhere? Continuing here > will lead to undefined behavior. Same is probably true for the other WARN_ONs. The way I see it is: the kernel is will be left in a bad state in the case of any failure, regardless of if we bail out or continue. AFAICT, there is no clean way to recover from a failure this early. Given that, it seems simpler (albeit marginally so) just to continue; so that's what I chose to do. I'm not opposed to bailing out, just not convinced it does anything for us. > > + > > + periph = kzalloc(sizeof(*periph), GFP_KERNEL); > > + WARN_ON(!periph); > > + > > + periph->clk_ctrl = slcr_base + reg; > > + spin_lock_init(&periph->clkact_lock); > > + > > + init.name = np->name; > > + init.ops = &zynq_periph_clk_ops; > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(parent_names); i++) > > + parent_names[i] = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, i); > > + init.parent_names = parent_names; > > + init.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(parent_names); > > + > > + periph->hw.init = &init; > > + > > + clk = clk_register(NULL, &periph->hw); > > + WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk)); > > + > > + err = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk); > > + WARN_ON(err); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > Not all of the peripheral clock generators have two output clocks. I think > it makes sense to use the number entries in clock-output-names here. Yes, I agree. I'll also update the bindings documentation. Thanks again, Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html