[PATCH 2/2] serial: samsung: Fixed wrong comparison for baudclk_rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



port->baudclk_rate should be compared to the rate of port->baudclk,
because port->baudclk_rate was assigned as the rate of port->baudclk previously.
So to check that the current baudclk rate is same as previous rate,
the target of comparison sholud be the rate of port->baudclk.

Signed-off-by: Jun-Ho, Yoon <junho78.yoon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kyoungil Kim <ki0351.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
index 5668538..cefdd2d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
@@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ static int s3c24xx_serial_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	 * a disturbance in the clock-rate over the change.
 	 */
 
-	if (IS_ERR(port->clk))
+	if (IS_ERR(port->baudclk))
 		goto exit;
 
-	if (port->baudclk_rate == clk_get_rate(port->clk))
+	if (port->baudclk_rate == clk_get_rate(port->baudclk))
 		goto exit;
 
 	if (val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE) {
-- 
1.7.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux