On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:49:37PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Commit 360f748b204275229f8398cb2f9f53955db1503b >> > "serial: PL011: clear pending interrupts" >> > attempts to clear interrupts by writing to a >> > yet-unassigned memory address. This fixes the issue. >> > >> > The breaking patch is marked for stable so should be >> > carried along with the other patch. >> > >> > Cc: Shreshtha Kumar Sahu <shreshthakumar.sahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Ugh; the original patch is obviously broken. How did it get applied >> without testing? >> >> Greg, can you get this out to Linus ASAP please? I have one comment >> below, but I don't think it should block merging this patch. >> >> Tested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks, I'll get it to him after 3.4-rc1 is out, in a few days, along > with other tty fixes being queued up. Hi Greg, Just wanted to check this didn't fall through the cracks, as I don't see it in your tty-next or tty-linus branches. The original bad commit causes Silent Boot Death on qemu ARM versatile, which is kind of nasty. It pretty much forces a bisection, which I did, which then led me here. Thanks, Paul. -- > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
