Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 4 November 2011 22:46, Mark Brown
> <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > exynos4120_serial_drv_data is only defined when building with support
> > for Exynos4210 so use the already provided define to ensure that we
> > don't reference it when building for other SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I missed that one. Thanks for the fix.
>
> The Samsung device tree patches will not be merged in v3.2 merge
> window. So should this fix be merged into the uart dt support patch or
> should this be a separate patch?
>
Hi all,
Okay, I will pick this up on 'next-samung-dt' tree which will be sent to
upstream in next time.
As a note, I need to sort out the tree based on v3.2-rc1 then will apply
this.
If any problems, please let me know.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> > index efe3756..7272eee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> > @@ -1649,7 +1649,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform,
> s3c24xx_serial_driver_ids);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > static const struct of_device_id s3c24xx_uart_dt_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart",
> > - .data = &exynos4210_serial_drv_data },
> > + .data = EXYNOS4210_SERIAL_DRV_DATA },
> > {},
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s3c24xx_uart_dt_match);
> > --
> > 1.7.7.1
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
