On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:58:20AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:56:00PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > It adds device tree probe support for imx tty/serial driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <jason.hui@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt | 19 +++++ > > > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++--- > > > 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..a9c0406 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > > > +* Freescale i.MX Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART) > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible : Should be "fsl,<soc>-uart" > > > +- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device > > > +- interrupts : Should contain uart interrupt > > > + > > > +Optional properties: > > > +- fsl,uart-has-rtscts : Indicate the uart has rts and cts > > > +- fsl,irda-mode : Indicate the uart supports irda mode > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +uart@73fbc000 { > > > + compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart"; > > > + reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>; > > > + interrupts = <31>; > > > + fsl,uart-has-rtscts; > > > +}; > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c > > > index 983f3bd..483c447 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c > > > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ > > > #include <linux/delay.h> > > > #include <linux/rational.h> > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > > > > > > #include <asm/io.h> > > > #include <asm/irq.h> > > > @@ -239,6 +241,12 @@ static struct platform_device_id imx_uart_devtype[] = { > > > } > > > }; > > > > > > +static struct of_device_id imx_uart_dt_ids[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX1_UART], }, > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, > > > + { /* sentinel */ }, > > > +}; > > > > Isn't this table a bit too small? What about the other SoCs? > I'd expect that using fsl,imx21-uart on imx51 would result in a working > port, but it feels stange and if that's the intention the example above > needs fixing. > Here is what I have in dts file for uart. The 'compatible' tells that it's a imx51-uart and compatible with imx21-uart. uart0: uart@73fbc000 { compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart"; reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>; interrupts = <31>; fsl,uart-has-rtscts; }; I did not buy it until I got convinced by Grant here [1]. We do not need this long table until there are some soc specific thing to distinguish. Currently, they are all compatible with imx21-uart and share imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART]. { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx25-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx27-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx31-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx50-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx53-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/198935 -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html