On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2011-02-18 at 09:06:15 +0100, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 2011-02-18 at 08:29:58 +0100, Thomas Chou <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 02/18/2011 03:23 PM, Tobias Klauser wrote: >> >>> On 2011-02-17 at 23:15:04 +0100, Greg KH<greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:28:23PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote: >> >>>>> This patchset adds updates taken from the Nios2 Linux port (currently >> >>>>> out-of-tree) repository to the altera_jtaguart driver. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> And this time with the correct cover letter right away :-) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Tobias Klauser (5): >> >>>>> tty: serial: altera_jtaguart: Don't use plain integer as NULL pointer >> >>>>> tty: serial: altera_jtaguart: Remove unused function >> >>>>> early_altera_jtaguart_setup >> >>>>> tty: serial: altera_jtaguart: Support getting mapbase and IRQ from >> >>>>> resources >> >>>>> tty: serial: altera_jtaguart: Fixup type usage of port flags >> >>>>> tty: serial: altera_jtaguart: Add device tree support >> >>>> >> >>>> After this series, I get the following build error: >> >>>> CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/altera_jtaguart.o >> >>>> drivers/tty/serial/altera_jtaguart.c:485:3: error: unknown field ???of_match_table??? specified in initializer >> >>> >> >>> Strange, I didn't get that one when compile testing against linux-next >> >>> on x86_64. Though it seems I didn't correctly test it on nios2 and I got >> >>> a compile error about a missing semicolon in the definition of >> >>> altera_jtaguart_match there. >> >> >> >> It might be that the of_match_table patch is available in Grant's branch >> >> only, which is for v3.6.39. Maybe you can ask Grant to take this patch >> >> 5/5. >> > >> > That explains it, thanks Thomas. >> > >> > Greg, care to take only patches 1/5 to 4/5 for now? I'll resubmit 5/5 >> > for the 2.6.39 merge window, unless Grant already wants to take this to >> > his tree. >> >> I'm happy to take this patch if it doesn't depend on the first 4. >> Alternately Greg, you could merge commit c9e358dfc "driver-core: >> remove conditionals around devicetree pointers" from my >> devicetree/test branch on git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6. I >> won't be rebasing that commit and it is the first commit on top of >> 2.6.38-rc1. > > The patch doesn't depend on the first 4, so you could take it if Greg > doesn't oppose. Okay, I'll merge the ones that depend on my tree and that Greg acks. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
