On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:50:07 +0200 Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Augment the UPF_FIXED_TYPE logic, which currently applies to UART ports > provisioned using platform_device_register. > > The suggested patch applies same logic into 'serial8250_register_ports', > making UART ports provisioned using early_serial_setup inherit their > properties from the uart_config entry. > > The patch applies to linux-2.6.32-rc5 > > Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > diff -upr linux-2.6.32-rc5.clean/drivers/serial/8250.c > linux-2.6.32-rc5/drivers/serial/8250.c > --- linux-2.6.32-rc5.clean/drivers/serial/8250.c 2009-10-16 > 02:41:50.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.32-rc5/drivers/serial/8250.c 2009-10-26 11:36:09.000000000 > +0200 Your email client wordwraps the patches. > @@ -2704,6 +2704,14 @@ serial8250_register_ports(struct uart_dr > struct uart_8250_port *up = &serial8250_ports[i]; > > up->port.dev = dev; > + > + if (up->port.flags & UPF_FIXED_TYPE) { > + up->port.fifosize = > + uart_config[up->port.type].fifo_size; > + up->capabilities = uart_config[up->port.type].flags; > + up->tx_loadsz = uart_config[up->port.type].tx_loadsz; > + } > + > uart_add_one_port(drv, &up->port); > } > } Why don't we also initialise up->port.type here? Perhaps it would be neater to write a little function to do this rather than copy-n-paste? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html