On 2009-08-21, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I seem to have run into a problem which people have been
> pointing out for years, but never gets fixed.
>
> In tty_driver.h, the low-level driver routine wait_until_set()
> function takes an "int" as a timeout value:
[...]
> But, in tty_ioclt.c in the tty_wait_unti_sent() function, the
> timeout is a "long":
[...]
> This is fine on 32-bit systems, where "int" and "long" are
> equivalent, but it results in breakage on 64-bit systems.
Is this not the correct forum in which to report bugs in the
tty layer code?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! How many retured
at bricklayers from FLORIDA
visi.com are out purchasing PENCIL
SHARPENERS right NOW??
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
