On 2008-08-04, Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2008-08-04, Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Monday 04 August 2008, Tosoni wrote:
>>> About the flags names -- CARTS, UART_FCTR_RS485
>>>
>>> May I suggest CRTSTOGGLE since it is known by that kind of name in other
>>> OS's :-)
>>
>> I like Russell's proposal of sticking to CRTSCTS and adding options to setserial:
>>
>>> Should CRTSCTS be a global "enable some kind of flow control" bit and
>>> setserial be used to configure the actual flow control method
>>> (conventional RTS/CTS, DTR/DSR, alternate RTS/CTS, RS485 on RTS,
>>> RS485 on DTR) ?
>>
>> Any opinion on that ?
>
> Opposed.
>
> 1) CRTSCTS means something quite specific. Rather than
> overload that name for something unrelated, create a new
> mode bit for the new mode.
Besides, there are often times when you want _both_ RTS toggle
and CTS flow control. If both RTS toggle and RTSCTS flow
control are set, the "toggle" function would have priority
control of the RTS pin.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Was my SOY LOAF left
at out in th'RAIN? It tastes
visi.com REAL GOOD!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
