On Monday 04 August 2008, Tosoni wrote: > About the flags names -- CARTS, UART_FCTR_RS485 > > May I suggest CRTSTOGGLE since it is known by that kind of name in other > OS's :-) I like Russell's proposal of sticking to CRTSCTS and adding options to setserial: > Should CRTSCTS be a global "enable some kind of flow control" bit and > setserial be used to configure the actual flow control method > (conventional RTS/CTS, DTR/DSR, alternate RTS/CTS, RS485 on RTS, > RS485 on DTR) ? Any opinion on that ? > And further, it says was RTS will do, instead of why. Maybe someone could > use it for something other than RS485 ? I agree with you here. The name should reflect that RTS is used in 'envelope' mode (asserted during data transmission, idle between frames). Best regards, -- Laurent Pinchart CSE Semaphore Belgium Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A B-1410 Waterloo Belgium T +32 (2) 387 42 59 F +32 (2) 387 42 75
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
