Sounds like an equivalent to WaitCommEvent in Windows NT. But there is a problem in Linux, which does not exist in Windows where the serial port is locked by the requesting process: in Linux you would have to associate your "recorded state" with the requesting process, because several processes may use your new ioctl at the same time. Or, you can say that it's a feature of your ioctl to handle only one process :-) Also, in Windows there is an extra feature, you can set a mask of which signal changes you want to monitor, you might want this feature as well Best regards Tosoni, Acksys > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-serial-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-serial-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]De la part de Dominique > Larchey-Wendling > Envoyé : jeudi 25 janvier 2007 18:10 > À : linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Objet : New IOCTL for Modem Control Lines monitoring > > > In kernel 2.6 (file drivers/serial/serial_core.c), there > exists 2 IOCTL > for receiving signals over the modem control lines > > TIOCMIWAIT (function uart_wait_modem_status) for waiting for a change > on the modem status lines. > > TIOCGICOUNT (uart_get_count) to get the current state of the modem > status lines. > > While these IOCTL may be helpful to use the serial port as a general > serial communication device over modem control lines like in > the following (and quite old) discussion > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg0 > 0407.html > > I find a kind of "design" flaw with the 2 IOCTL for such a goal. > > Indeed, it is possible that a modem status change occurs in between > ioctl(TIOCGICOUNT) and ioctl(TIOCMIWAIT) possibly locking a > communication because the last call would miss the status change > necessary to trigger a response. Indeed ioctl(TIOCMIWAIT) cannot > detect a change occurring before its call. > > Even tough such an event would have a low probability to occur > if the 2 ioctl are close enough, it is still possible. This is > a race condition (outside the kernel but possibly locking some > process). > > I propose the introduction of a new ioctl to solve this race, > implemented through the NEW function uart_wait_new_status associated > to a NEW ioctl. > > The idea is that this new call would detect a change not compared > to the status at the beginning of the call but compared to some > previously recorded state. This way, the new ioctl would not > miss a status change, even if it occurs before the call to the > ioctl. > > Could it be considered for inclusion in the kernel ? > It does not change any existing behavior. However it > does need a new ioctl name/number. > > Thanks in advance for any comment > > Dominique Larchey-Wendling > CNRS, France > > ------------------------------------------------- > Code to include in drivers/serial/serial_core.c > ------------------------------------------------- > > /* > * Wait until any NEW signal is received on some selected > * modem inputs lines (DCD,RI,DSR,CTS), compared to some > * previously considered state. > * If asked to wait on none, simply returns the current > * status > */ > > static int > uart_wait_new_status(struct uart_state *state, struct > serial_icounter_struct __user *icnt) > { > struct uart_port *port = state->port; > DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); > struct serial_icounter_struct icount; > struct uart_icount cstart, cnow; > unsigned int mask, mctrl; > int ret; > > if (copy_from_user(&icount, icnt, sizeof(icount))) > return -EFAULT; > > cstart.cts = icount.cts; > cstart.dsr = icount.dsr; > cstart.rng = icount.rng; > cstart.dcd = icount.dcd; > cstart.rx = icount.rx; > cstart.tx = icount.tx; > cstart.frame = icount.frame; > cstart.overrun = icount.overrun; > cstart.parity = icount.parity; > cstart.buf_overrun = icount.buf_overrun; > > /* if mask == 0 just simulate behavior of TIOCGICOUNT > */ > > mask = (unsigned) icount.reserved[0]; > > /* enable Modem Status Interrupts in case not already done > */ > > spin_lock_irq(&port->lock); > port->ops->enable_ms(port); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->lock); > > add_wait_queue(&state->info->delta_msr_wait, &wait); > > for (;;) { > spin_lock_irq(&port->lock); > mctrl = port->ops->get_mctrl(port); > memcpy(&cnow, &port->icount, sizeof(struct > uart_icount)); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->lock); > > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > if (((mask & TIOCM_RNG) && (cnow.rng != cstart.rng)) || > ((mask & TIOCM_DSR) && (cnow.dsr != cstart.dsr)) || > ((mask & TIOCM_CAR) && (cnow.dcd != cstart.dcd)) || > ((mask & TIOCM_CTS) && (cnow.cts != cstart.cts)) || > (mask == 0)) > { > ret = 0; > break; > } > > schedule(); > > /* see if a signal did it */ > if (signal_pending(current)) { > ret = -ERESTARTSYS; > break; > } > > } > > current->state = TASK_RUNNING; > remove_wait_queue(&state->info->delta_msr_wait, &wait); > > if (ret < 0) return ret; > > /* we got our (new) state, transfer to user space > */ > > icount.cts = cnow.cts; > icount.dsr = cnow.dsr; > icount.rng = cnow.rng; > icount.dcd = cnow.dcd; > icount.rx = cnow.rx; > icount.tx = cnow.tx; > icount.frame = cnow.frame; > icount.overrun = cnow.overrun; > icount.parity = cnow.parity; > icount.brk = cnow.brk; > icount.buf_overrun = cnow.buf_overrun; > icount.reserved[0] = mctrl; > > return copy_to_user(icnt, &icount, sizeof(icount)) ? > -EFAULT : 0; > } > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-serial" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
