On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 16:19 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:47:34 -0700 > > > On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 08:16 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:32:43AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 07:19 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > >> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:04:37PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > > > fallthrough may become a pseudo reserved keyword so this only use of > >> > > > fallthrough is better renamed to allow it. > > > > Can you or any other maintainer apply this patch > > or ack it so David Miller can apply it? > > I, like others, don't like the lack of __ in the keyword. It's kind of > rediculous the problems it creates to pollute the global namespace like > that and yes also inconsistent with other shorthands for builtins. Rejected? I think that's inappropriate. As coded, it's nothing like a fallthrough and the rename to unhandled is more descriptive.