On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:04:33AM +0800, Ji Jianwen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:38:36AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:39:30PM +0800, Jianwen Ji wrote:
> > > > Try to bind again if the errno is EADDRINUSE.
> > > > Some tests failed to run sometimes, here is one snapshot:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > test_sockopt.c 25 PASS : setsockopt(SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS) - one-to-many style invalid hb demand
> > > > test_sockopt.c 26 BROK : bind: Address already in use
> > > > DUMP_CORE ../../src/testlib/sctputil.h: 145
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > test_1_to_1_sendmsg.c 10 PASS : sendmsg() on a closed association - EPIPE
> > > > test_1_to_1_sendmsg.c 11 BROK : bind: Address already in use
> > > > DUMP_CORE ../../src/testlib/sctputil.h: 145
> > > >
> > > > The reason is that it closed a socket and then created a new socket
> > > > to bind the same socket address as before, which was not released
> > > > yet.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jianwen Ji <jijianwen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > src/testlib/sctputil.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/src/testlib/sctputil.h b/src/testlib/sctputil.h
> > > > index 9dbabd4..5b807c7 100644
> > > > --- a/src/testlib/sctputil.h
> > > > +++ b/src/testlib/sctputil.h
> > > > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > #include <string.h>
> > > > +#include <unistd.h>
> > > >
> > > > typedef union {
> > > > struct sockaddr_in v4;
> > > > @@ -72,6 +73,10 @@ typedef union {
> > > > #endif
> > > > #define SCTP_TESTPORT_2 (SCTP_TESTPORT_1+1)
> > > >
> > > > +#ifndef MAX_BIND_RETRYS
> > > > +#define MAX_BIND_RETRYS 10
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > #define SCTP_IP_BCAST htonl(0xffffffff)
> > > > #define SCTP_IP_LOOPBACK htonl(0x7f000001)
> > > >
> > > > @@ -140,9 +145,22 @@ static inline int test_socket(int domain, int type, int protocol)
> > > >
> > > > static inline int test_bind(int sk, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen)
> > > > {
> > > > - int error = bind(sk, addr, addrlen);
> > > > - if (-1 == error)
> > > > - tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "bind: %s", strerror(errno));
> > > > + int error = 0, i = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + do {
> > > > + if (i > 0) sleep(1); /* sleep a while before new try... */
> > > > +
> > > > + error = bind(sk, addr, addrlen);
> > > > + if (-1 == error && errno != EADDRINUSE) {
> > > > + tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "bind: %s", strerror(errno));
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + i++;
> > > > + if (i >= MAX_BIND_RETRYS) {
> > > > + tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "bind: %s", strerror(errno));
> > > > + }
> > > > + } while (error < 0 && i < MAX_BIND_RETRYS);
> > > > +
> > > > return error;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.14.5
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I don't think this is really going to do much. If a socket isnt released then
> > > its not likely to be released in the amount of time it takes to iterate over
> > > this loop 10 times, and theres no guarantee that it will in the future. If we
> > > want to ensure avoid EADDRINUSE, the second bind should probably just use
> > > SCTP_TESTPORT_2, instead of reusing _1
> >
> > Agree. I'll go farther: if the test doesn't have a strict need on a
> > specific port number, it should let the kernel assign one. That way it
> > will also stress the port allocator. Most of the tests can bind
> > without specifying a port and then ask which port it got.
> >
> > Marcelo
>
> That would be great if we make test not depend on specific port number.
> Please help look into it.
> Take test_sockopt.c for example:
> 733
> 734 close(udp_svr_sk);
> 735 close(udp_clt_sk);
> 736
> 737
> 738 /* TEST #6: SCTP_DEFAULT_SEND_PARAM socket option. */
> 739 /* Create and bind 2 UDP-style sockets(udp_svr_sk, udp_clt_sk) and
> 740 * 2 TCP-style sockets. (tcp_svr_sk, tcp_clt_sk)
> 741 */
> 742 udp_svr_sk = test_socket(pf_class, SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP);
> 743 udp_clt_sk = test_socket(pf_class, SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP);
>
> ...
>
> 753 test_bind(udp_svr_sk, &udp_svr_loop.sa, sizeof(udp_svr_loop));
> 754 test_bind(udp_clt_sk, &udp_clt_loop.sa, sizeof(udp_clt_loop));
>
> It closes 2 sockets at line 734 and 735, then next test item binds the
> same socket addresses again at line 753 and 754.
That's what it does now but does it have to be the same addresses?
> If run this program in a loop, the EADDRINUSE error will definitely
> happen at some point.
> while true; do
> ./test_sockopt
> [ $? -ne 0 ] && exit
> done
Yep.
What about something like the below. In theory the getsockaddr result
should be equivalent to what was passed to the function, and thus can
be used by a subsequent call to connect().
(The additional include breaks the build, btw)
diff --git a/src/testlib/sctputil.h b/src/testlib/sctputil.h
index 9dbabd4762e0..e18d5b55110b 100644
--- a/src/testlib/sctputil.h
+++ b/src/testlib/sctputil.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
#endif
#include <string.h>
+#include <arpa/inet.h>
typedef union {
struct sockaddr_in v4;
@@ -146,6 +147,28 @@ static inline int test_bind(int sk, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen)
return error;
}
+static inline int test_bind_freeport(int sk, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen)
+{
+ struct sockaddr sa;
+ int error;
+
+ if (sa.sa_family == AF_INET)
+ ((struct sockaddr_in *)addr)->sin_port = 0;
+ else if (sa.sa_family == AF_INET6)
+ ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)addr)->sin6_port = 0;
+
+ error = test_bind(sk, addr, addrlen);
+ if (-1 == error)
+ return error;
+
+ addrlen = sizeof(sa);
+ error = getsockname(sk, &sa, &addrlen);
+ if (-1 == error)
+ tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "getsockname: %s", strerror(errno));
+
+ return error;
+}
+
static inline int test_bindx_add(int sk, struct sockaddr *addr, int count)
{
int error = sctp_bindx(sk, addr, count, SCTP_BINDX_ADD_ADDR);
