On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:38:36AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:39:30PM +0800, Jianwen Ji wrote:
> > > Try to bind again if the errno is EADDRINUSE.
> > > Some tests failed to run sometimes, here is one snapshot:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > test_sockopt.c 25 PASS : setsockopt(SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS) - one-to-many style invalid hb demand
> > > test_sockopt.c 26 BROK : bind: Address already in use
> > > DUMP_CORE ../../src/testlib/sctputil.h: 145
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > test_1_to_1_sendmsg.c 10 PASS : sendmsg() on a closed association - EPIPE
> > > test_1_to_1_sendmsg.c 11 BROK : bind: Address already in use
> > > DUMP_CORE ../../src/testlib/sctputil.h: 145
> > >
> > > The reason is that it closed a socket and then created a new socket
> > > to bind the same socket address as before, which was not released
> > > yet.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jianwen Ji <jijianwen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > src/testlib/sctputil.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/testlib/sctputil.h b/src/testlib/sctputil.h
> > > index 9dbabd4..5b807c7 100644
> > > --- a/src/testlib/sctputil.h
> > > +++ b/src/testlib/sctputil.h
> > > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #include <string.h>
> > > +#include <unistd.h>
> > >
> > > typedef union {
> > > struct sockaddr_in v4;
> > > @@ -72,6 +73,10 @@ typedef union {
> > > #endif
> > > #define SCTP_TESTPORT_2 (SCTP_TESTPORT_1+1)
> > >
> > > +#ifndef MAX_BIND_RETRYS
> > > +#define MAX_BIND_RETRYS 10
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > #define SCTP_IP_BCAST htonl(0xffffffff)
> > > #define SCTP_IP_LOOPBACK htonl(0x7f000001)
> > >
> > > @@ -140,9 +145,22 @@ static inline int test_socket(int domain, int type, int protocol)
> > >
> > > static inline int test_bind(int sk, struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen)
> > > {
> > > - int error = bind(sk, addr, addrlen);
> > > - if (-1 == error)
> > > - tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "bind: %s", strerror(errno));
> > > + int error = 0, i = 0;
> > > +
> > > + do {
> > > + if (i > 0) sleep(1); /* sleep a while before new try... */
> > > +
> > > + error = bind(sk, addr, addrlen);
> > > + if (-1 == error && errno != EADDRINUSE) {
> > > + tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "bind: %s", strerror(errno));
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i++;
> > > + if (i >= MAX_BIND_RETRYS) {
> > > + tst_brkm(TBROK, tst_exit, "bind: %s", strerror(errno));
> > > + }
> > > + } while (error < 0 && i < MAX_BIND_RETRYS);
> > > +
> > > return error;
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.14.5
> > >
> > >
> > I don't think this is really going to do much. If a socket isnt released then
> > its not likely to be released in the amount of time it takes to iterate over
> > this loop 10 times, and theres no guarantee that it will in the future. If we
> > want to ensure avoid EADDRINUSE, the second bind should probably just use
> > SCTP_TESTPORT_2, instead of reusing _1
>
> Agree. I'll go farther: if the test doesn't have a strict need on a
> specific port number, it should let the kernel assign one. That way it
> will also stress the port allocator. Most of the tests can bind
> without specifying a port and then ask which port it got.
>
> Marcelo
That would be great if we make test not depend on specific port number.
Please help look into it.
Take test_sockopt.c for example:
733
734 close(udp_svr_sk);
735 close(udp_clt_sk);
736
737
738 /* TEST #6: SCTP_DEFAULT_SEND_PARAM socket option. */
739 /* Create and bind 2 UDP-style sockets(udp_svr_sk, udp_clt_sk) and
740 * 2 TCP-style sockets. (tcp_svr_sk, tcp_clt_sk)
741 */
742 udp_svr_sk = test_socket(pf_class, SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP);
743 udp_clt_sk = test_socket(pf_class, SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP);
...
753 test_bind(udp_svr_sk, &udp_svr_loop.sa, sizeof(udp_svr_loop));
754 test_bind(udp_clt_sk, &udp_clt_loop.sa, sizeof(udp_clt_loop));
It closes 2 sockets at line 734 and 735, then next test item binds the
same socket addresses again at line 753 and 754.
If run this program in a loop, the EADDRINUSE error will definitely
happen at some point.
while true; do
./test_sockopt
[ $? -ne 0 ] && exit
done
Br,
Jianwen
