On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:07:52PM +0100, Julian Cordes wrote: > When a FORWARD-TSN-Chunk with a relative high cum-tsn-value is injected > then the linux kernel ignores this valid FORWARD-TSN-Chunk. > It should instead send an SACK-Chunk where the cum_tsn is equal to the > cum_tsn specified in the FORWARD-TSN. You mean, with the cum_tsn specified on the *injected* FORWARD-TSN. Is that so? > > Testscript available at: > https://github.com/nplab/PR_SCTP_Testsuite/blob/master/forward-tsn/receiver-side-implementation/receiver-side-implementation-11.pkt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
