Issue with Forward-TSN-Chunks containing high cum_tsn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When a FORWARD-TSN-Chunk with a relative high cum-tsn-value is injected
then the linux kernel ignores this valid FORWARD-TSN-Chunk.
It should instead send an SACK-Chunk where the cum_tsn is equal to the
cum_tsn specified in the FORWARD-TSN.

Testscript available at:
https://github.com/nplab/PR_SCTP_Testsuite/blob/master/forward-tsn/receiver-side-implementation/receiver-side-implementation-11.pkt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux