On 22 Sep 2014, at 09:57, Raman Gupta <ramangupta16@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The SO_REUSEPORT socket option was introduced in mainstream kernel 3.9 >>> for TCP/UDP. Is this option supported for SCTP also? >> Have you looked at >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6458#section-8.1.27 > > > 1) Even with one-to-one style SCTP socket (SOCK_STREAM) I am getting > port already in use error. > 2) SO_REUSEPORT socket option I am setting before calling sctp_bindx. > 3) The second process which results in port already in use error for > second, has exactly same code (same binary) as the first process thus > all SCTP sockets bound to the same port have set the SO_REUSEPORT > option. > 4) Using SOL_SOCKET option level What happens if you use the SCTP level option as described in the link I provided? Best regards Michael > > I am using centos6 with kernel 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64 > > Thanx > > --Raman > > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Michael Tuexen > <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 21 Sep 2014, at 08:32, Raman Gupta <ramangupta16@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> The SO_REUSEPORT socket option was introduced in mainstream kernel 3.9 >>> for TCP/UDP. Is this option supported for SCTP also? >> Have you looked at >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6458#section-8.1.27 >> >> Best regards >> Michael >>> >>> The latest centos6 kernel 2.6.32-417.el6 allows this socket option >>> for SCTP, but does not seem to support it. I get port already in use >>> error. >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
