From: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 2013/12/5 21:32, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:19:25AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
rto_min should be smaller than rto_max while rto_max should be larger
than rto_min. Add two proc_handler for the checking. Add the check in
sctp_setsockopt_rtoinfo.
delete a blank line in proc_sctp_do_hmac_alg() declaration.
Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 5 ++++
net/sctp/sysctl.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 72046b9..2e1af1b 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -2818,6 +2818,11 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_rtoinfo(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, unsigne
if (copy_from_user(&rtoinfo, optval, optlen))
return -EFAULT;
+ if (rtoinfo.srto_min < 1 ||
+ rtoinfo.srto_max > 86400000 ||
These should be defiend to some descriptive value.
Thanks for your suggestion. I will fix it in v5.
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
