Re: [PATCH v4] sctp: check the rto_min and rto_max

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:19:25AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
> rto_min should be smaller than rto_max while rto_max should be larger
> than rto_min. Add two proc_handler for the checking. Add the check in
> sctp_setsockopt_rtoinfo.
> delete a blank line in proc_sctp_do_hmac_alg() declaration.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/sctp/socket.c |  5 ++++
>  net/sctp/sysctl.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 72046b9..2e1af1b 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -2818,6 +2818,11 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_rtoinfo(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, unsigne
>  	if (copy_from_user(&rtoinfo, optval, optlen))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> +	if (rtoinfo.srto_min < 1 ||
> +	    rtoinfo.srto_max > 86400000 ||
These should be defiend to some descriptive value.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux