On 08/09/2013 09:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 20:39 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
On 08/09/2013 07:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Why not using a dummy destructor ?
It would just be useless once we do proper accounting for all chunks.
But, I'll send a different idea if this is just too ugly.
Setting skb->sk is no accounting.
Right. It is only really used right now when constructing a packet to
transmit out of a set of chunks.
It seems you would better use skb->cb[] so that you are 100% sure this
skb->sk doesn't leak outside of SCTP code.
Hmm.. That might work too. I am building a framework right now that
we can use to add proper buffer accounting. That's probably a better
long term solution.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
