On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 20:39 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > On 08/09/2013 07:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Why not using a dummy destructor ? > > It would just be useless once we do proper accounting for all chunks. > But, I'll send a different idea if this is just too ugly. Setting skb->sk is no accounting. It seems you would better use skb->cb[] so that you are 100% sure this skb->sk doesn't leak outside of SCTP code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
