Re: [PATCH 1/2] sctp: proc: protect bind_addr->address_list accesses with rcu_read_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/06/2012 02:25 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxxxxx>

address_list is protected via the socket lock or RCU. Since we don't want
to take the socket lock for each assoc we dump in procfs a RCU read-side
critical section must be entered.

V2: Skip local addresses marked as dead

Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxx>

-vlad

---
  net/sctp/proc.c | 7 ++++++-
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
index 9966e7b..06b05ee 100644
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
@@ -139,7 +139,11 @@ static void sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(struct seq_file *seq, struct sctp_ep_commo
  	    primary = &peer->saddr;
  	}

-	list_for_each_entry(laddr, &epb->bind_addr.address_list, list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(laddr, &epb->bind_addr.address_list, list) {
+		if (!laddr->valid)
+			continue;
+
  		addr = &laddr->a;
  		af = sctp_get_af_specific(addr->sa.sa_family);
  		if (primary && af->cmp_addr(addr, primary)) {
@@ -147,6 +151,7 @@ static void sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(struct seq_file *seq, struct sctp_ep_commo
  		}
  		af->seq_dump_addr(seq, addr);
  	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
  }

  /* Dump remote addresses of an association. */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux