On Monday 2012-09-10 20:01, David Miller wrote: >> >> So you are perfectly ok with invalidating IPv6 cache when IPv4 table >> changes, but not invalidating IPv4 cache if IPv6 table changes? > >Due to tunneling I can't see how this is avoidable? > >We do ipv6 over ipv4, but not vice-versa. I have a setup here where 6 machines are connected with one another (most of them) to form 9 IPsec sessions, all of which are ESP6 links - since native IPv6 is provided - that also handle the site-to-site IPv4 traffic. Does that count? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
