On 09/10/2012 01:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:35:03 -0400
I am not sure this is right... This has a side-effect that when an
rt_cache_flush() is called, it invalidates IPv6 routes a well....
Its all fine and good do this when a new policy is added, but not when
IPv4 routing table changes.
I disagree.
So you are perfectly ok with invalidating IPv6 cache when IPv4 table
changes, but not invalidating IPv4 cache if IPv6 table changes?
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
