Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:25:31 -0400

> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:44:25PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400
>> > 
>> > > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
>> > > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
>> > > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
>> > > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.
>> > 
>> > Yes, that would make sense.
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> I'll propose it in a few days.
>> Neil
>> 
> How does this language sound to you?

Looks fine to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux