Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400
> 
> > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
> > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
> > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
> > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.
> 
> Yes, that would make sense.
> 


I'll propose it in a few days.
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux