Re: [PATCH 11/17] smartpqi: minor tweaks to update time support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:29:20PM +0000, Don Brace wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Johannes Thumshirn [mailto:jthumshirn@xxxxxxx]

[...]

> 
> The reason is that we want it run immediately (or close to immediately).
> 
> The code could be restructured to avoid calling this function with a 0, but it would result in more code and no benefit.

OK, now I'm not sure if we talked past each other. I didn't mean
"don't call schedule_delayed_work() with a delay of 0" but "why aren't
you using schedule_work() instead". But maybe it's just too early in
the morning and I didn't have enough coffee yet.

Thanks,
	Johannes

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux