On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:29:20PM +0000, Don Brace wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Johannes Thumshirn [mailto:jthumshirn@xxxxxxx] [...] > > The reason is that we want it run immediately (or close to immediately). > > The code could be restructured to avoid calling this function with a 0, but it would result in more code and no benefit. OK, now I'm not sure if we talked past each other. I didn't mean "don't call schedule_delayed_work() with a delay of 0" but "why aren't you using schedule_work() instead". But maybe it's just too early in the morning and I didn't have enough coffee yet. Thanks, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html