Re: [PATCH 1/2] lpfc: support for CPU phys_id and core_id on PowerPC64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Martin,

On 06/21/2016 11:16 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Distros are free to carry a patch such as yours. That puts the burden on
them and not on upstream which is going in a different direction as
outlined by Christoph.

This is ultimately Broadcom's decision. It is their driver.

Right, I understand.  I submitted the patch in case they see value in
having it upstream, as some distros discuss/ask about what's the status
(or differences to) upstream.

In some cases, a rationale like this one being documented on a mailing
list is sufficient, provided the patch hasn't received other technical
problems, for example.

Thanks for the review/comments (Christoph too),

--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux