Re: [PATCH 1/2] lpfc: support for CPU phys_id and core_id on PowerPC64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/21/2016 11:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I really don't think this sort of low level information has business
in a low level driver.  I've been trying to put some infrastructure
together to move this to the core kernel [1], and it would be good to
help use this in more drivers.  Especially given that lpfc may use
blk-mq which will not respect this current assignment for the queue
mapping.

Agree.

However, this patchset targets the non blk-mq/scsi-mq usage of the
lpfc driver, which falls back to CPU-number/queue-number mapping.

This turns out to still be the case w/ some distros where ppc64/le
usually runs, on which it would be easier to adapt this relatively
small change than moving forward w/ blk-mq/scsi-mq, for example --
even if the latter is clearly a superior approach.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-June/005012.html


--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux