On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 18:24 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > I'm going to downvote this topic just like last year with my PC hat > > on as I think it's a) not relevant or usefully discussable at LSF > > and b) framed the wrong way. > > I'm not sure LSF is the right platform, but I gotta say that this > thread indicates that there's bad blood going around here and it > needs to sorted out. OK, could we make this more concrete. "Bad blood" or perhaps bias against people ideas or patches is easy to allege, especially if you think it will get your patches in, and, in the current climate, easy to make stick because you can pin this on a maintainer who's simply having a bad day or is overloaded. Do you have an example of a set of patches you think have been unreasonably rejected? Probably discussing the issues before a wider audience will help solve them before you drag someone to the "right forum" (to me, those words conjure visions of pitch forks, stocks and pilliories, but that's probably because the original version of Frankenstien was on recently). James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
