Re: [PATCH 76/71] ncr5380: Enable PDMA for DTC chips

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 06 December 2015 04:40:56 Finn Thain wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> 
> > Add I/O register mapping for DTC chips and enable PDMA mode.
> > 
> > These chips have 16-bit wide HOST BUFFER register (counter register at
> > offset 0x0d increments by 2 on each HOST BUFFER read). Detect it
> > automatically.
> > 
> > Large PIO transfers crash at least the DTCT-436P chip (all reads result
> > in 0xFF) so this patch actually makes it work.
> > 
> > The chip also crashes when we bang the C400 host status register too
> > heavily after PDMA write - a small udelay is needed.
> > 
> > Tested on DTCT-436P and verified that it does not break 53C400A.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h |    4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c b/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c
> > index 85da3c2..9816b81 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c
> > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int __init generic_NCR5380_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
> >  			ports = ncr_53c400a_ports;
> >  			break;
> >  		case BOARD_DTC3181E:
> > -			flags = FLAG_NO_PSEUDO_DMA;
> > +			flags = FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUP;
> 
> Nice!
> 
> >  			ports = dtc_3181e_ports;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > @@ -412,10 +412,12 @@ static int __init generic_NCR5380_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
> >  			hostdata->c400_blk_cnt = 1;
> >  			hostdata->c400_host_buf = 4;
> >  		}
> > -		if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A) {
> > +		if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A ||
> > +		    overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_DTC3181E) {
> >  			hostdata->c400_ctl_status = 9;
> >  			hostdata->c400_blk_cnt = 10;
> >  			hostdata->c400_host_buf = 8;
> > +			hostdata->c400_host_idx = 13;
> >  		}
> >  #else
> >  		instance->base = overrides[current_override].NCR5380_map_name;
> > @@ -430,8 +432,20 @@ static int __init generic_NCR5380_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
> >  		if (NCR5380_init(instance, flags))
> >  			goto out_unregister;
> >  
> > +#ifndef SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM
> > +		/* read initial value of index register */
> > +		i = NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_host_idx);
> > +		/* read something from host buffer */
> > +		NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_host_buf);
> > +		/* I/O width = index register increment */
> > +		hostdata->io_width = NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_host_idx) - i;
> > +		if (hostdata->io_width < 0)
> > +			hostdata->io_width += 128;
> > +#endif
> 
> Will the result depend on the initial state of the chip, such as
> CSR_TRANS_DIR or CSR_HOST_BUF_NOT_RDY?
> 
> It is possible to generate an interrupt with the buffer read, which should 
> be masked at the chip.
> 
> This buffer read may cause the 53C400 control logic to signal the 53C80 
> core. I suppose it is unlikely to cause any signalling on the SCSI bus 
> unless the 53C80 happened to be in DMA mode.
> 
> The possibility that io_width == 0 is not handled; wouldn't this result 
> indicate that PDMA shouldn't be used?
> 
> io_width can be calculated without a conditional statement, which may be 
> easier to read.
> 
> Can we be confident that detection will fail for all devices that don't 
> support word-sized IO, to avoid a regression?
> 
> The patch seems to assume that no memory-mapped card needs word-sized IO 
> for PDMA. Can you confirm?

My memory-mapped Canon card is a 8-bit ISA card so it can't do 16-bit I/O by
definition. Don't know if there are any 16-bit memory-mapped cards.

> The previous version of this patch was simpler and more predictable. You 
> enabled word-size IO for DTC3181E which is testable. Does this version 
> benefit any other cards?

Probably not. Looks like this code creates more problems that it solves.
I'll revert to the original approach.

> > +
> >  		if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400 ||
> > -		    overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A)
> > +		    overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A ||
> > +		    overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_DTC3181E)
> >  			NCR5380_write(hostdata->c400_ctl_status, CSR_BASE);
> >  
> >  		NCR5380_maybe_reset_bus(instance);
> > @@ -558,11 +572,10 @@ static inline int NCR5380_pread(struct Scsi_Host *instance, unsigned char *dst,
> >  		while (NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_ctl_status) & CSR_HOST_BUF_NOT_RDY);
> >  
> >  #ifndef SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM
> > -		{
> > -			int i;
> > -			for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
> > -				dst[start + i] = NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_host_buf);
> > -		}
> > +		if (hostdata->io_width == 2)
> > +			insw(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, dst + start, 64);
> > +		else
> > +			insb(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, dst + start, 128);
> >  #else
> >  		/* implies SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM */
> >  		memcpy_fromio(dst + start,
> > @@ -579,11 +592,10 @@ static inline int NCR5380_pread(struct Scsi_Host *instance, unsigned char *dst,
> >  		}
> >  
> >  #ifndef SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM
> > -		{
> > -			int i;	
> > -			for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
> > -				dst[start + i] = NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_host_buf);
> > -		}
> > +		if (hostdata->io_width == 2)
> > +			insw(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, dst + start, 64);
> > +		else
> > +			insb(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, dst + start, 128);
> >  #else
> >  		/* implies SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM */
> >  		memcpy_fromio(dst + start,
> > @@ -642,10 +654,10 @@ static inline int NCR5380_pwrite(struct Scsi_Host *instance, unsigned char *src,
> >  		while (NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_ctl_status) & CSR_HOST_BUF_NOT_RDY)
> >  			; // FIXME - timeout
> >  #ifndef SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM
> > -		{
> > -			for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
> > -				NCR5380_write(hostdata->c400_host_buf, src[start + i]);
> > -		}
> > +		if (hostdata->io_width == 2)
> > +			outsw(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, src + start, 64);
> > +		else
> > +			outsb(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, src + start, 128);
> >  #else
> >  		/* implies SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM */
> >  		memcpy_toio(hostdata->iomem + NCR53C400_host_buffer,
> > @@ -657,12 +669,11 @@ static inline int NCR5380_pwrite(struct Scsi_Host *instance, unsigned char *src,
> >  	if (blocks) {
> >  		while (NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_ctl_status) & CSR_HOST_BUF_NOT_RDY)
> >  			; // FIXME - no timeout
> > -
> >  #ifndef SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM
> > -		{
> > -			for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
> > -				NCR5380_write(hostdata->c400_host_buf, src[start + i]);
> > -		}
> > +		if (hostdata->io_width == 2)
> > +			outsw(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, src + start, 64);
> > +		else
> > +			outsb(instance->io_port + hostdata->c400_host_buf, src + start, 128);
> >  #else
> >  		/* implies SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM */
> >  		memcpy_toio(hostdata->iomem + NCR53C400_host_buffer,
> > @@ -682,8 +693,10 @@ static inline int NCR5380_pwrite(struct Scsi_Host *instance, unsigned char *src,
> >  	/* All documentation says to check for this. Maybe my hardware is too
> >  	 * fast. Waiting for it seems to work fine! KLL
> >  	 */
> > -	while (!(i = NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_ctl_status) & CSR_GATED_53C80_IRQ))
> > +	while (!(i = NCR5380_read(hostdata->c400_ctl_status) & CSR_GATED_53C80_IRQ)) {
> > +		udelay(4); /* DTC436 chip hangs without this */
> >  		;	// FIXME - no timeout
> > +	}
> 
> When you added the braces, the lone semicolon became redundant. But I 
> think the entire loop is bogus.
> 
> Why do we wait for CSR_GATED_53C80_IRQ? I can understand testing it during 
> a transfer but why afterwards? (The core driver could test for the IRQ 
> flag in the Bus and Status Register, at the end of a DMA, if this scsi 
> host has no IRQ line.)
> 
> The comments and the 53C400 datasheet say we should instead wait for 
> CSR_53C80_REG. I agree. The g_NCR5380 wrapper driver can't safely return 
> control to the core driver unless the 53C80 registers are available.
> 
> The algorithm in the datasheet waits for CSR_53C80_REG before checking 
> BASR_END_DMA_TRANSFER, checking interrupt flags, disabling DMA mode etc. 
> 
> g_NCR5380.c has an '#if 0' around the BASR_END_DMA_TRANSFER check, because 
> it doesn't wait for CSR_53C80_REG. Does NCR's algorithm work with your 
> cards?

I'll leave this to patch 77. I guess that it will work properly without
waiting for CSR_GATED_53C80_IRQ.

> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * I know. i is certainly != 0 here but the loop is new. See previous
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h b/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h
> > index c5e57b7..b3936aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
> >  #define NCR5380_implementation_fields \
> >  	int c400_ctl_status; \
> >  	int c400_blk_cnt; \
> > -	int c400_host_buf;
> > +	int c400_host_buf; \
> > +	int c400_host_idx; \
> > +	int io_width;
> >  
> >  #else 
> >  /* therefore SCSI_G_NCR5380_MEM */
> > 
> 


-- 
Ondrej Zary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux