Hi Finn, On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, Julian Calaby wrote: > >> Hi Finn, >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Julian Calaby wrote: >> > >> >> > - if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A) { >> >> > + if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A || >> >> > + overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_DTC3181E) { >> >> >> >> These if statements are starting to get a bit long, would it make >> >> sense to replace them with a flag or equivalent? >> > >> > To what end? Shorter lines? As in, >> >> Pretty much, each expression is quite long and they seem to be growing >> fairly rapidly as you and Ondrej discover similar boards. > > Each BOARD_* macro actually refers to a whole category of devices. No new > boards, devices or categories of devices have been discovered. > > Ondrej is enabling and/or fixing PDMA functionality for three existing > device categories, for which the driver already has a nominally compatible > PDMA implementation. I meant discovering boards which are similar. Either way, I'm not sure it matters that much. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html