On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Or is correct, > > I have attempted to convert iser to use blk_iopoll in the past, however > I've seen inconsistent performance and latency skews (comparing to > tasklets iser is using today). This was manifested in IOPs test cases > where I ran multiple threads with higher queue-depth and not in > sanitized pure latency (QD=1) test cases. Unfortunately I didn't have > the time to pick it up since. > > I do have every intention of testing it again with this. If it still > exist we will need to find the root-cause of it before converting > drivers to use it. Good, this way (inconsistent performance and latency skews) or another (all shines up) -- please let us know your findings, best through commenting within V > 0 the cover letter posts of this series -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
