On 07/29/2015 11:20 AM, Viswas G wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 07/29/2015 08:27 AM, Viswas.G@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Viswas G <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> If the link error happens, we don't need to disconnect the phy,
>>> which will remove the drive. Instead acknowledging the controller
>>> and logging the error will be enough.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viswas G <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suresh Thiagarajan <Suresh.Thiagarajan@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 12 ------------
>>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>> index dced9f7..3d8b4ae 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>> @@ -3176,9 +3176,6 @@ static int mpi_hw_event(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>>> pm8001_printk("HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_INVALID_DWORD\n"));
>>> pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req(pm8001_ha, 0,
>>> HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_INVALID_DWORD, port_id, phy_id, 0, 0);
>>> - sas_phy_disconnected(sas_phy);
>>> - phy->phy_attached = 0;
>>> - sas_ha->notify_port_event(sas_phy, PORTE_LINK_RESET_ERR);
>>> break;
>>> case HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_DISPARITY_ERROR:
>>> PM8001_MSG_DBG(pm8001_ha,
>>> @@ -3186,9 +3183,6 @@ static int mpi_hw_event(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>>> pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req(pm8001_ha, 0,
>>> HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_DISPARITY_ERROR,
>>> port_id, phy_id, 0, 0);
>>> - sas_phy_disconnected(sas_phy);
>>> - phy->phy_attached = 0;
>>> - sas_ha->notify_port_event(sas_phy, PORTE_LINK_RESET_ERR);
>>> break;
>>> case HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_CODE_VIOLATION:
>>> PM8001_MSG_DBG(pm8001_ha,
>>> @@ -3196,9 +3190,6 @@ static int mpi_hw_event(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>>> pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req(pm8001_ha, 0,
>>> HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_CODE_VIOLATION,
>>> port_id, phy_id, 0, 0);
>>> - sas_phy_disconnected(sas_phy);
>>> - phy->phy_attached = 0;
>>> - sas_ha->notify_port_event(sas_phy, PORTE_LINK_RESET_ERR);
>>> break;
>>> case HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_LOSS_OF_DWORD_SYNCH:
>>> PM8001_MSG_DBG(pm8001_ha, pm8001_printk(
>>> @@ -3206,9 +3197,6 @@ static int mpi_hw_event(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>>> pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req(pm8001_ha, 0,
>>> HW_EVENT_LINK_ERR_LOSS_OF_DWORD_SYNCH,
>>> port_id, phy_id, 0, 0);
>>> - sas_phy_disconnected(sas_phy);
>>> - phy->phy_attached = 0;
>>> - sas_ha->notify_port_event(sas_phy, PORTE_LINK_RESET_ERR);
>>> break;
>>> case HW_EVENT_MALFUNCTION:
>>> PM8001_MSG_DBG(pm8001_ha,
>>>
>> So what happens with the port, then?
>> Will you be getting another event when the port finally disconnects?
>> If not, how to you remove the port after a link failure?
>>
>
> When the Phy disconnects, we will be getting the PHY DOWN events for
> the phys in that port and we will remove that port.
>
Okay, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
