Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Use && instead of & for boolean expression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewed-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks

-- james


On 7/22/2015 4:53 AM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
Use logical instead of bitwise AND.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@xxxxxx>
---

diff -urp a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c	2015-07-05 22:18:43.933739150 +0200
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c	2015-07-22 10:31:14.240209475 +0200
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ lpfc_work_done(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
  								HA_RXMASK));
  			}
  		}
-		if ((phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4) &
+		if ((phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4) &&
  				 (!list_empty(&pring->txq)))
  			lpfc_drain_txq(phba);
  		/*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux