On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:24:55PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> other. This patch adds the refcount, and refactors the code to use it.
>
> Additionally, we cannot iterate over the sas_device_list without
> holding the lock, or we risk corrupting random memory if items are
> added or deleted as we iterate. This patch refactors _scsih_probe_sas()
> to use the sas_device_list in a safe way.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h | 22 +-
> drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c | 12 +-
> 3 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h
> index caff8d1..78f41ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@
> * @flags: MPT_TARGET_FLAGS_XXX flags
> * @deleted: target flaged for deletion
> * @tm_busy: target is busy with TM request.
> + * @sdev: The sas_device associated with this target
> */
> struct MPT2SAS_TARGET {
> struct scsi_target *starget;
> @@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ struct MPT2SAS_TARGET {
> u32 flags;
> u8 deleted;
> u8 tm_busy;
> + struct _sas_device *sdev;
> };
>
>
> @@ -376,8 +378,24 @@ struct _sas_device {
> u8 phy;
> u8 responding;
> u8 pfa_led_on;
> + struct kref refcount;
> };
>
> +static inline void sas_device_get(struct _sas_device *s)
> +{
> + kref_get(&s->refcount);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sas_device_free(struct kref *r)
> +{
> + kfree(container_of(r, struct _sas_device, refcount));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sas_device_put(struct _sas_device *s)
> +{
> + kref_put(&s->refcount, sas_device_free);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * struct _raid_device - raid volume link list
> * @list: sas device list
> @@ -1095,7 +1113,9 @@ struct _sas_node *mpt2sas_scsih_expander_find_by_handle(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *
> u16 handle);
> struct _sas_node *mpt2sas_scsih_expander_find_by_sas_address(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER
> *ioc, u64 sas_address);
> -struct _sas_device *mpt2sas_scsih_sas_device_find_by_sas_address(
> +struct _sas_device *mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr(
> + struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u64 sas_address);
> +struct _sas_device *__mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr(
> struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u64 sas_address);
>
> void mpt2sas_port_enable_complete(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c
> index 3f26147..fad80ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c
> @@ -526,8 +526,43 @@ _scsih_determine_boot_device(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc,
> }
> }
>
> +struct _sas_device *
> +__mpt2sas_get_sdev_from_target(struct MPT2SAS_TARGET *tgt_priv)
> +{
> + struct _sas_device *ret;
> +
Does this need a:
assert_spin_locked(&ioc->sas_device_lock);
?
Otherwise this looks sensible to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
