Re: [PATCH] SCSI-aic94xx: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:18:56 +0100
> 
> The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c
> index c56741f..0bfdcba 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c
> @@ -597,8 +597,7 @@ static void asd_destroy_ha_caches(struct asd_ha_struct *asd_ha)
>  	if (asd_ha->hw_prof.scb_ext)
>  		asd_free_coherent(asd_ha, asd_ha->hw_prof.scb_ext);
>  
> -	if (asd_ha->hw_prof.ddb_bitmap)
> -		kfree(asd_ha->hw_prof.ddb_bitmap);
> +	kfree(asd_ha->hw_prof.ddb_bitmap);
>  	asd_ha->hw_prof.ddb_bitmap = NULL;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ASD_MAX_PHYS; i++) {
> 

How are the chances to integrate this update suggestion
into another source code repository?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux