On 05/22/15 08:11, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
index e2c0eaf..def5bc8 100644
--- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
+++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
@@ -638,7 +638,6 @@ struct se_lun_acl {
};
struct se_dev_entry {
- bool def_pr_registered;
/* See transport_lunflags_table */
u32 lun_flags;
u32 mapped_lun;
@@ -655,7 +654,8 @@ struct se_dev_entry {
struct se_node_acl *se_node_acl;
struct se_lun_acl __rcu *se_lun_acl;
spinlock_t ua_lock;
- struct se_lun *se_lun;
+ struct se_lun __rcu *se_lun;
+ unsigned long pr_reg;
struct list_head alua_port_list;
struct list_head ua_list;
struct hlist_node link;
Hello Nic,
This change causes the "se_lun = deve->se_lun" assignment in
transport_lookup_cmd_lun() to assign an RCU pointer to a non-RCU
pointer. Shouldn't such an assignment be protected via rcu_dereference() ?
Thanks,
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
