Re: [PATCH-v2 2/9] target/pr: Use atomic bitop for se_dev_entry->pr_reg reservation check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 06:11:04AM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> +	clear_bit(1, &orig->pr_reg);

Can you call it ->flags and give the bit a meaningful name?

> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
> index c0b593a..d29b39c 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
> @@ -327,9 +327,13 @@ static int core_scsi3_pr_seq_non_holder(
>  	int we = 0; /* Write Exclusive */
>  	int legacy = 0; /* Act like a legacy device and return
>  			 * RESERVATION CONFLICT on some CDBs */
> +	bool registered = false;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	se_deve = target_nacl_find_deve(nacl, cmd->orig_fe_lun);
> +	if (se_deve)
> +		registered = test_bit(1, &se_deve->pr_reg);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();

It would be good to just sort out the registered and co variables
here before the RCU changes, as in:

http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi.git/commitdiff/6372d9f62c83acb30d051387c40deb4dbdcaa376
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux