-----Original Message----- > From: Don Brace > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:56 PM > To: 'Tomas Henzl'; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; axboe@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] cciss: correct the non-resettable board list > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:40 AM > > To: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Don Brace; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; axboe@xxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cciss: correct the non-resettable board list > > > > The hpsa driver carries a more recent version, > > copy the table from there. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/block/cciss.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c b/drivers/block/cciss.c > > index 48498220cd..0ca65b25ef 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/cciss.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/cciss.c > > @@ -582,12 +582,32 @@ static u32 unresettable_controller[] = { > > 0x3215103C, /* Smart Array E200i */ > > 0x3237103C, /* Smart Array E500 */ > > 0x323D103C, /* Smart Array P700m */ > > + 0x40800E11, /* Smart Array 5i */ > > 0x409C0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 */ > > 0x409D0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 EM */ > > + 0x40700E11, /* Smart Array 5300 */ > > + 0x40820E11, /* Smart Array 532 */ > > + 0x40830E11, /* Smart Array 5312 */ > > + 0x409A0E11, /* Smart Array 641 */ > > + 0x409B0E11, /* Smart Array 642 */ > > + 0x40910E11, /* Smart Array 6i */ > > }; > > > > /* List of controllers which cannot even be soft reset */ > > static u32 soft_unresettable_controller[] = { > > + 0x40800E11, /* Smart Array 5i */ > > + 0x40700E11, /* Smart Array 5300 */ > > + 0x40820E11, /* Smart Array 532 */ > > + 0x40830E11, /* Smart Array 5312 */ > > + 0x409A0E11, /* Smart Array 641 */ > > + 0x409B0E11, /* Smart Array 642 */ > > + 0x40910E11, /* Smart Array 6i */ > > + /* Exclude 640x boards. These are two pci devices in one slot > > + * which share a battery backed cache module. One controls the > > + * cache, the other accesses the cache through the one that controls > > + * it. If we reset the one controlling the cache, the other will > > + * likely not be happy. Just forbid resetting this conjoined mess. > > + */ > > 0x409C0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 */ > > 0x409D0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 EM */ > > }; > > @@ -4663,8 +4683,7 @@ static int cciss_kdump_hard_reset_controller(struct > > pci_dev *pdev) > > */ > > cciss_lookup_board_id(pdev, &board_id); > > if (!ctlr_is_resettable(board_id)) { > > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Cannot reset Smart Array 640x " > > - "due to shared cache module."); > > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Controller not resettable\n"); > > return -ENODEV; > > } > > > > -- > > 1.9.3 Goofed on the last one. Sorry about that. Signed-off-by Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
