[PATCH v2 06/12] IB/srp: Fix reconnection failure handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Although it is possible to let SRP I/O continue if a reconnect
results in a reduction of the number of channels, the current
code does not handle this scenario correctly. Instead of making
the reconnect code more complex, consider this as a reconnection
failure.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.riemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #v3.19
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
index 83e4d8a..982e329 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -1259,11 +1259,8 @@ static int srp_rport_reconnect(struct srp_rport *rport)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < target->ch_count; i++) {
 		ch = &target->ch[i];
-		if (ret || !ch->target) {
-			if (i > 1)
-				ret = 0;
+		if (ret || !ch->target)
 			break;
-		}
 		ret = srp_connect_ch(ch, multich);
 		multich = true;
 	}
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux